21.5.09

evolution of a fatalist

Over the years, I've experimented with various reactions to stories like this.
Dennis Dumm commuted by bike every day and followed the rules of the road, his girlfriend said. The driver won't be cited.

In a number of ways, I can relate to Dennis Dumm. He was the same age as me, interested in bicycle commuting, getting free of his car, a photography enthusiast, etc. In the old days, I would have expressed my reaction to this tragic incident with a mix of surprise/dismay and trumped-up outrage. I may have joined some of the more reactionary types on local forums in calling for the truck driver's head.

But now I look at this story with a more jaded eye. The truck driver wasn't cited for his likeliest violation of traffic statute, failure to yield, which shouldn't be surprising to anybody who follows stories of this type. I would submit that the truck driver will have to deal with his own sense of guilt, which is a larger penalty than some trivial traffic citation. But blame can also be heaped on city policymakers and street engineers for creating a bicycling facility that is commonly described by people who use it as "treacherous". Perhaps, also, Dumm could have selected a safer route or been more cognizant of the heavily loaded truck that was turning into his lane. Frankly, I'm done with the blame game. Without assigning blame, I can concoct any number of scenarios that would have changed the factors in play just slightly, and would result in a different outcome. Sort of a butterfly effect kind of logic. Why blame a truck driver, city engineers, or the cyclist's technique, when we can chalk up the unfortunate convergence to meteorology, how long the driver in front of the dump truck spent eating breakfast, or the inflation pressure of Dumm's bicycle tires? Add or subtract 5 seconds, and it might all be different, and Dumm would have lived to ride again, unaware of how close he was to being dead.

Rather than trying to identify a singular villain, who can conveniently be held to account for this irreversible tragedy, I take this story as a constructive learning experience. I'm lucky to have learned the lesson of big trucks turning into my lane through a close call or two, but the Dennis Dumm story really drives the point home. Be aware, ride conservatively, maintain escape routes in traffic, etc. Beyond this detail of cycling in traffic is a greater lesson. As the economist John Maynard Keynes famously noted, in the long run, we're all dead. Whether we get hit by a truck, contract an inexplicable terminal cancer, or live to 100 in fine health before dying peacefully in our sleep, there are no guarantees, and no entitlements. Being alive exposes us to all manner of risks to life and limb, and none of us are getting out alive.

9 comments:

Doug said...

I heard about this story on Minnesota Public Radio this morning. They mentioned he was wearing a helmet.

cindy said...

Even in my own car, I always look out for the 'bigger' guy. There's a lot of construction going on near my home, and the big dump trucks and swinging booms could render my driver's window and thus my head into mush. No matter who's fault it is, I'm the one who is screwed up for life, and/or dead. No amount of liability and payment will suffice.

So, I yield to the big guys. No matter who'e right. I may be little, but I want to be alive and well.

Gilby said...

I would call it diplomatic, not jaded, and I feel the same way. Neither of them were blatantly at fault; they were both just doing what they always do the same way they always do, and the way it's worked out just fine dozens, hundreds, or thousands of times before.

And still my heart aches not only for the cyclist's loved ones, but also for the driver who has to spend the rest of his life wondering what he could have done differently.

michele said...

Gilbey....the driver could have been more attentive to *all* traffic. He could have checked that the lane he was turning into was actually free. In any event a failure to yield ticket was warrented and should have been issued.

Dennis's family and loved ones should be able to sue the trucking company and the driver and the fact that MPD failed to do their job and issue the ticket could impact any legal proceedings. Maybe that's not the romantic take on things but it is realistic. MPD didn't do their job and they should be taken out on that point.

stacey said...

I'm with Gilby on part of her observation. It in no way relieves the blame on the truck driver, but I have to think that if it were me driving the truck I would rather kill myself than live every day for the rest of my life with the guilt that killing somebody else brings.

I ride bike every day to work through that mess of construction and detours and I assume that every vehicle around me is hostile or inattentive, and even with a totally defensive attitude it could have been me. Or you. It could be anybody. Cars and bikes don't mix, and I say that as a car-free daily commuter.

It could be a truck. It could be a bus. It could be a stray bullet or random violence or cancer or a heart attack. We're all going to die, all we can do is try to play the odds and not tempt fate.

We're all worm food sooner or later, just have to try to live life to the fullest otherwise fear wins.

charlie said...

Jim,
I went into PSP today and heard one of the kitchen staff was also hit on his bike on Park Avenue just a day earlier, and he spent the night in the hospital.

Unlike the truck driver, the guy who hit him kept on going.

Anonymous said...

The hit-n-run drivers are just pussies trying to be tough.

They should realize that there could be visible damage to their car that is consistent with a car-bike collision. Then they have to quickly conceal what they did, or try making dumb excuses to friends and family who point to their car and say, "Gee, look at that."

Personally, I'd rather that one of those nut jobs receives a quick bullet to the head from the guy on the bike. We can only wait and hope for that.

Gilby said...

Whether the driver is charged or not, we will always be vulnerable. Even when we are doing everything within our power to follow the rules, not a single one of us is ever 100% in control of any situation. I believe a cyclist can wear a helmet, have brakes and the rest of the bike in good repair, and know and follow the laws, while meanwhile a driver uses their signals, and checks their mirrors and blinds spots; and yet as each of them proceeds with caution once the light turns green, there is still room for error.

This is terrifying, and I think this lack of control is what's at the root of the anger we all feel.

Jack said...

Where I live, bicycle activists typically exploit a bicyclist's death to advance their own bicycle agenda.

Don't get me wrong – I tend to support that agenda, and I'm glad when they're able to advance the "cause" of providing better bicycle facilities.

But, in reality, the tragic deaths involve a variety of factors, some of which have nothing to do with bicycle paths, lanes, facilities, etc.

Given that I live in a rural area, it's unrealistic to think that – even under the most ideal circumstances – there would be bike paths everywhere.

Do we really expect taxpayers to spend $20 million on a path that would be used for five to 10 recreational cyclists one a month, four months out of the year? Of course not!

What little funding is available has to be used for high-use areas.

Out on the rural roads, the deaths usually involve inattentive drivers. Or drivers who are loaded.

That's not an easy or simple problem to solve, regardless of how much people rant or how many heads they vow to cut off.