Just reading over at Ecovelo about Davis, CA, which is deemed to be a Platinum-level Bicycle Friendly Community by people who purport to know about such things. I was a little curious about the standing of my own city of residence, and I quickly found the master list. Minneapolis isn't a platinum-level bike town, nor is it, to my surprise, a gold town. It's down in the silver level, with the various university towns (e.g. Ann Arbor, Austin, Gainesville) and high-end tourist havens (e.g. Steamboat Springs) of the country.
I don't really know (or care) about the specifics of these rankings, but I suspect that a lot of the relative rankings sort not just by objective measures of actual bike-friendliness, but also by which communities have taken the time to fill out the application in a way that sells the community as a bike-friendly place (Minneapolis apparently got on the silver list just last year). I've ridden in Portland a bit, and admired their bike boxes, covered bike parking, and bike boulevard system. But despite these infrastructural accommodations, I still had a close call or two with motorists (nothing serious) and spent plenty of time dodging potholes. This Spring, I spent two days riding in Indianapolis, which didn't make the list at all and is generally regarded as bike-unfriendly, and found some neat trails, quiet streets, some interesting semi-underground bike culture, and extraordinarily courteous drivers. A couple weeks later, I was riding all over San Diego County, California (also not on the list, except for the city of Oceanside, which is bronze), and was delighted to observe that just about every thru-street of any size has a wide bike lane. Even with a limited understanding of the local geography, I was able to ride anywhere, reasonably confident that I wouldn't get marooned in some cars-only ghetto.
My Platinum-level Portland bicycling experience was excellent, and I hope to go back there sooner than later, but the other places were great fun, too, and shouldn't be written off. These ranking lists are probably fine for general comparisons in the broadest sense, but my experiences suggest that bike friendliness has more to do with the individual cyclist's willingness to get out there and find it than it does with the efforts of city hall.
15.6.09
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
Minneapolis is in the top ten for eccentric-bike-blogger-friendly cities.
I just realized that as many times as I've been to Indy, I've never ridden a bike there.
I have no idea how that happened.
I wonder how Oceanside, CA to LaJolla, CA area (along highway 101) ranks. I drove through there recently, and it had a lot of bikeriders in the tight driving paths. I felt they should have better than that. I'm always afraid of a mishap, for me in my car, and for them in their more vulnerable narrow bike lane. I'm not even sure they had a lane, which is the point.
101 doesn't have much of a bike lane, but most of it has a decent shoulder.
Look at the cutesy categories used to rank cities: Engineering, Education, Encouragement, Enforcement and Evaluation. Just the kind of crap a foundation or policy wonk would love, but has little to do with the actual Experience of being on a bike in the confines of the city!
Fruita, Colorado, is a town built around bike culture and with the exception of the engineering part (in a true bike town, bike lanes would be weird) it probably does all that stuff better than most. But precisely because it's a bike town it would never do the paperwork.
Crazy.
I've never ridden in Davis, but I used to lunch there on occasion. It is *tiny* in comparison to Minneapolis. The size of one of your neighborhoods. You could probably do the whole town in an hour. Oh, and a decent trail to get to Sacramento. That's it.
Same thing for Palo Alto. There are good trails through town, but it's a very small place compared to Minneapolis.
I doubt that CA has any area as large as the Twin Cities with bike trails and lanes as good or useful as yours.
I guess my main point was to suggest that lists like these could be harmful from a bike advocacy standpoint. In a world of excuse-makers, a city's poor showing in this inane ranking system could serve as a demotivator to would-be cyclers.
Of course, the other effect of such lists is to be a carrot for policymakers to encourage the desired policy shifts. But if the list isn't credible...
We're looking to become a bike friendly city here in Carson City. It's more of an exercise though, to see how we rank, or see what we would need to do to rank. It's going to take a lot of data analysis on our part, but at least it will give us a baseline when asking the city for what we need.
Post a Comment